Finds the signal
Watches every source continuously and picks up the moment a company shows it has the problem. Merges duplicates into one record with every reason attached.
Recurring clients are the whole business model. The trick is reaching them in the narrow window when switching is actually on the table.
Eighteen things have to happen between a stranger and a meeting on your calendar. Here they are in the order they happen, so you can see exactly what's involved. Seventeen of them run on their own. The one that doesn't is the conversation, and that's on purpose.
We spin up a server that belongs to you, lock it down, and install the whole toolkit on it. Then we plug it into Telegram so you can just text it. Hermes runs it. So can Claude, or whatever agent you already use. Underneath, ACA holds every lead, sequence, mailbox and conversation.
No bought database. We point it at the places where companies show they've got the problem: job posts, funding news, maps, review sites, communities, your competitors' followers. Then we leave it running, so the list keeps growing.
Five gates, cheapest first: hard rules, then how fresh the signal is, then an ICP score, then exclusions, then suppression. Every rejection gets a reason written next to it.
We find the actual decision maker and a way to reach them that works. Several providers in a row, then we verify it ourselves. If it comes back invalid, we go looking again instead of sending anyway.
Separate sending domains, set up properly, and every mailbox warmed before it sends a single campaign email.
This one isn't sequential. Warmup takes weeks, so it starts on day one. Otherwise you finish the list and then sit there for a month.
Ten sequences. Several offers, several openings, all written to be compared. You don't pick the winner here. The market picks it, usually inside a few weeks.
We load the verified list in and split it so the offers get tested against comparable segments. Suppression gets re-checked at send, not at build.
Lead magnets on LinkedIn, deliberately narrow, so the wrong person doesn't bother asking for one.
It captures the request, delivers instantly, scores them against the same gates the outbound list gets, and opens with a real question instead of a thank-you page.
Every contact we enrich gets turned into a fingerprint before it leaves your server. Meta and Google can match it. Neither of them ever sees your list.
Also not sequential. This one fills up every time step 04 finds someone.
LinkedIn, Meta and Google, all pointed at one page. Not a brochure: a calculator that runs their numbers, with the booking form right there on the same screen.
A person reads every reply, from both lanes. The second someone replies, every sequence they're in stops. Everywhere. The agent has already pulled the thread, the signal and the score together, so nobody starts cold, and it drafts a reply for the person to change or bin.
On the calendar, with a brief attached: what the signal was, what they scored, and the whole thread.
A booking is a conversion. It goes back to the agent so it learns who books, and to Meta and Google so they stop optimising for clicks and start optimising for meetings.
Happens the same second as 15. Both fire off the booking.
Testimonials and case studies that match their situation, plus the confirmation and the no-show nudges. The gap between booking and the call is where most meetings quietly die.
Same day, while it's still warm. A recap in their words, and a scope built from what they actually said.
Paced, not nagging, with material aimed at whatever they pushed back on. It runs until you get a yes or a clean no.
The win goes back to Meta and Google as a lookalike seed, and back to the agent so it rewrites the ICP from who actually bought. Offers that lost get retired. Round three beats round one because it's built on results instead of guesses.
Different event from 14. Booked teaches it who books. Signed teaches it who buys.
The hours in outbound aren't in the sending. They're in the research: reading a company's site to work out whether they're a fit, hunting down the right person, checking you haven't already emailed them, writing an opener that references something real. Done properly that's ten or fifteen minutes a prospect. An agent does it in seconds and shows its working. Across a few thousand companies, that's a full-time job you get back.
And it isn't smarter than your best salesperson. It's more consistent. It doesn't get bored on row 400, doesn't skip the suppression check on a Friday, and never sends without verifying first.
High volume, low judgement.
Low volume, high judgement. The agent drafts and briefs. The person decides and sends.
That split is the whole design, not a limitation we're working around. The agents take the part that's volume so a person has time for the part that's judgement. Take the agents away and someone does ten thousand research tasks by hand. Take the person away and you have a robot negotiating with your next client. Neither of those is a business.
Here's the crew, and what each one is allowed to touch.
Watches every source continuously and picks up the moment a company shows it has the problem. Merges duplicates into one record with every reason attached.
Reads the company like a good salesperson would: the site, the positioning, who they sell to. Scores it against your ICP and writes down why.
Exclusions, suppression, existing customers, anyone who asked not to be contacted, anyone who bounced. Runs on rules. No model gets a vote.
Runs the providers one by one, verifies the result itself, and goes looking again when something comes back invalid instead of sending anyway.
Builds the first line from the signal that surfaced this company, in your voice. Then checks its own work for broken variables before anything ships.
Picks the mailbox, respects the daily cap, paces it like a person, rotates domains, and pulls one out the moment placement drops.
Reads every reply and sorts it: interested, out of office, wrong person, bounce, not now. Stops every sequence that lead is in, then wakes a human with the full thread.
After a deal signs, works out what the buyers had in common, rewrites the ICP filters, and seeds the lookalikes for the next round.
Anyone can pull a list. The difference is timing: four moments where the same message goes from ignorable to obvious.
A new entity needs an accountant, and the window between forming and choosing one is short.
The books have outgrown whoever is currently doing them, which is the conversation you want to be in.
Reporting requirements just changed, and so did the amount of work their current setup can absorb.
Timing is most of the pitch. The same message lands very differently six weeks before a deadline.
If you take nothing else from this page, take these. Most of them you can use tomorrow, with or without an agent running them.
Tell us who your firm sells to. Hermes builds the list, the filters run, the infrastructure warms, and the first conversations start, with a human on your side of every one of them.
Your model, your keys, your tenant. Cancel anytime.